Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M +79%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy