Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +3322%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
16
3840
Shading Units
128
240
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
G80
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
90 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.0
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy