Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +1623%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
51W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GK107
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy