Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +220%
12.63 TFLOPS
Tesla K20X
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
2688
240
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
235W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GK110
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy