Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P620 Mobile and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (2100MHz vs 1443MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
18944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620 Mobile
1.478 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +10955%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1177 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1443 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
19456
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
46.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
23.09 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
46.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
146 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy