NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P620 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1443MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620 Mobile
+219%
1.478 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1177 MHz
Base Clock
-
1443 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
24
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
46.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
23.09 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1478 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
46.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
