Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1545MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +413%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
36
512
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy