Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1785MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +163%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy