Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +183%
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P620
125
Tesla K20Xm +197%
372
OctaneBench
Quadro P620
25
Tesla K20Xm +152%
63
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
2688
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy