NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1395MHz vs 1380MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
5.299 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 2
+88%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
945 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
56
1920
Shading Units
3584
120
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
240
Tensor Cores
448
30
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
TU102
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
