Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
1904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +11675%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Type
System Shared
192bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

30
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1920
Shading Units
16
120
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
C79
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
-
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy