Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1912 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +27789%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 450
0.019 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
1
1920
Shading Units
8
120
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.920 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.920 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.20 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G98
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy