NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1537MHz vs 1380MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
5.299 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Mobile
+18%
6.296 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
945 MHz
Base Clock
832 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
16
1920
Shading Units
2048
120
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
64
30
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.18 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GA107S
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
