NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Tesla K80
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 12GB VRAM Tesla K80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1380MHz vs 824MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 240.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
+28%
5.299 TFLOPS
Tesla K80
4.113 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
945 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
824 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
2496
120
TMUs
208
64
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.85 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
171.4 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.113 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1371 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GK210
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
GK210-885-A1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
7.1 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.7
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
