Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +1525%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
192
120
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GK107
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy