Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +751%
5.299 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
30
1920
Shading Units
240
120
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GT200B
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy