Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile +1628%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1110 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
320
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

99.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
15.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
249.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GT200B
N19E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy