Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +1440%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
24
2304
Shading Units
192
144
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GT200B
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy