Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1545MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +276%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
1024
144
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GM204
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy