CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (160W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
+80%
7.119 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
VS
Tesla K20Xm
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
36
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
2688
144
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
48
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GK110
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
160W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
4
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
7
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy