Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q +1001%
8.294 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
576
192
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
259.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
259.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy