NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1700MHz vs 1545MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
9.492 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+138%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
6656
192
TMUs
416
64
ROPs
0
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104B
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
