Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +821%
9.492 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
14
3072
Shading Units
448
192
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104B
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy