Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1815MHz
Lower TDP (230W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000
11.15 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +32%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
8192
192
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
8 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy