Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +387%
11.15 TFLOPS
GRID K280Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1536
192
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK104
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy