Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +3771%
11.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
12
3072
Shading Units
96
192
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
G92
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy