Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +38348%
11.15 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
2
3072
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
21W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
G86
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy