Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +183%
11.15 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2688
192
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
48
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
235W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK110
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy