Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 2GB VRAM Tesla M1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M1060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (188W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +1692%
11.15 TFLOPS
Tesla M1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
30
3072
Shading Units
240
192
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
188W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GT200B
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy