Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile +2802%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1275 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
24
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

139.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
419.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy