Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile +4013%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2019
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1275 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

139.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
419.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy