Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K100

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 256MB VRAM GRID K100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +4311%
14.38 TFLOPS
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy