Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1560MHz vs 1306MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +760%
14.38 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
640
288
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GM107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy