Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
4560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +12296%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
6
4608
Shading Units
48
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GT216
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy