CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
+790%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000M
1.615 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
VS
Quadro K5000M
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
1344
288
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.83 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.31 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.615 TFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.31 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q5-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K120Q
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI6
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy