Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +790%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000M
1.615 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
1344
288
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.83 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.31 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.615 TFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.31 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q5-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy