NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

VS

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages

Lower TDP (260W vs 295W)

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 8 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 60% (2495MHz vs 1560MHz)

More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)

1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

14.38 TFLOPS

Radeon PRO W7900 +326%

61.32 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

VS

Radeon PRO W7900

Graphics Card

Aug 2018

Release Date

Apr 2023

Quadro

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz

Base Clock

1855 MHz

1560 MHz

Boost Clock

2495 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz

Memory

24GB

Memory Size

48GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

384bit

Memory Bus

384bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

864.0GB/s

Render Config

72

SM Count

-

Compute Units

96

4608

Shading Units

6144

288

TMUs

384

96

ROPs

192

576

Tensor Cores

-

72

RT Cores

96

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

256 KB per Array

6 MB

L2 Cache

6 MB

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

479.0 GPixel/s

449.3 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

958.1 GTexel/s

28.75 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

122.6 TFLOPS

14.38 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

61.32 TFLOPS

449.3 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

Navi 31

TU102-875-A1

GPU Variant

Navi 31

Turing

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

5 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

57.7 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

529 mm²

Board Design

260W

TDP

295W

600 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

No outputs

Outputs

3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.2

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

2

NVIDIA Tesla S1070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

3

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

4

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

5

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

6

NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

7

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

8

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

9

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

10

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance