CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
NVIDIA RTX A4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
14.38 TFLOPS
RTX A4000
+33%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
VS
RTX A4000
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1305 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
48
4608
Shading Units
6144
288
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
96
576
Tensor Cores
192
72
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
140W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GA104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GA104-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 8 GB
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy