Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +49486%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
2
4608
Shading Units
16
288
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
21W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G86
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy