Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1620MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (260W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +7%
14.93 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
6912
288
TMUs
432
96
ROPs
192
576
Tensor Cores
432
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GA100
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
400W
600 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy