Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
4592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +33077%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Type
System Shared
384bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

72
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
16
288
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
C79
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
-
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
38W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy