NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

VS

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1620MHz vs 1530MHz)

More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 3 months late

Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)

512 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (250W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

14.93 TFLOPS

Tesla PG503 216 +4%

15.67 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

VS

Tesla PG503 216

Graphics Card

Aug 2018

Release Date

Nov 2019

Quadro

Generation

Tesla

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz

Base Clock

1312 MHz

1620 MHz

Boost Clock

1530 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1106 MHz

Memory

48GB

Memory Size

32GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

HBM2

384bit

Memory Bus

4096bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

1133GB/s

Render Config

-

72

SM Count

80

4608

Shading Units

5120

288

TMUs

320

96

ROPs

128

576

Tensor Cores

640

72

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

6 MB

L2 Cache

6 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

195.8 GPixel/s

466.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

489.6 GTexel/s

29.86 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

31.33 TFLOPS

14.93 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

15.67 TFLOPS

466.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

260W

TDP

250W

600 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

GV100

TU102-875-A1

GPU Variant

-

Turing

Architecture

Volta

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

12 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

21.1 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

7.0

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

2

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

3

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

4

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla K40s

5

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

6

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

7

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

8

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

9

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

10

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

Related News

1

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

2

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

3

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

4

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

5

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

6

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

7

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

8

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

9

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

10

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage