Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 260W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Feb 2006
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
-
288
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
NV43
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
NVS440 NPB
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
110 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy