Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +323%
14.93 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
2496
288
TMUs
208
96
ROPs
40
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK110
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy