Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
4544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 +10093%
16.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
8
4608
Shading Units
64
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G92
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy