Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
4600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 +77566%
16.31 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
1
4608
Shading Units
8
288
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
23W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G98
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy