Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 +1486%
16.31 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
14
4608
Shading Units
448
288
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
238W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GF100
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy