Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 FHHL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1770MHz vs 1290MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 +23%
16.31 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 FHHL
13.21 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1290 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
5120
288
TMUs
320
96
ROPs
128
576
Tensor Cores
640
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
412.8 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.42 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.21 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.605 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GV100
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy