NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 59W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+1580%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
8
896
Shading Units
64
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
59W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
G94
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
