NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1650MHz vs 1480MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
+2%
3.031 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
2934
Quadro P2000
+1%
2973
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+6%
1439
Quadro P2000
1350
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
8
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
GP106
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
