NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+416%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+1186%
386
Quadro K2000M
30
OctaneBench
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+491%
71
Quadro K2000M
12
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
GK107
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
